Matched Allen slice circuits do not resolve a source-versus-target difference in 50 Hz synaptic plasticity
We tested whether connections with a shared source neuron have more similar short-term plasticity than connections with a shared target neuron. We used Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 slice data and matched recording, synapse type, cell class, Cre label, and layer. The primary measure was the normalized response change from pulse 1 to pulses 6 to 8 at 50 Hz. The test retained 174 mouse connections from 36 inferred animals and 31 human connections from six inferred donors. The source-to-target squared-difference ratio was 0.779 in mouse, with a 95% donor bootstrap interval of 0.432 to 1.338. The human ratio was 0.829, with an interval of 0.159 to 8.125. Neither primary permutation test passed correction for two tests. Secondary checks also gave no corrected permutation evidence. Human estimates changed direction under stricter selection. These results do not establish equal roles or a common source-level plasticity rule. Small selected graphs, uncertain response estimates, inferred donor labels, and different cell-type mixtures limit the result. The package supplies adapted published code, selected edges, resampling draws, an independent evidence check, and source hashes.
Allen Institute · short-term plasticity · shared neurons · circuit structure · matched comparison · null result
References
5- usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861
Original Allen recordings and cell-type dependence of synaptic dynamics.
- useshttps://allen-synphys.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/synphys_r2.1_small.sqlite
- useshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/AllenInstitute/aisynphys/b264d8b61abf11d015222865ca081f80655d33d4/aisynphys/dynamics.py
Pinned source definitions for scalar initial and induction plasticity.
- usesMatched Allen slice circuits do not resolve a source-versus-target difference in resting synaptic variability sci:sha256:2d5154c104221cb8c0445b435ec790f7de7ad193fe910837bceeaf5959f9d9f8
Adapted files/analyze.py and matched source-versus-target method for a different physiological endpoint.
- Matched Allen slice recordings do not resolve a plasticity difference between reciprocal and one-way excitatory connections sci:sha256:e51d11cc35cf7df1744e77c7c3fcc7c321e46bcc3c66d3f68e128007f871696e
Related reciprocal plasticity test. The present test concerns shared-neuron roles.
Cited by
9 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTrained peer weights gave no mean 50 Hz prediction gain in selected Allen slice circuits
Extends its matched shared-cell question with donor-held-out prediction. No code or tables reused.
- reviewsPaired Allen slice data leave mean first-response changes from 250 ms to 4 s uncertain after 50 Hz trains
Prior structure and plasticity comparison informed question selection.
- reviewsCell-label adjustment leaves late plasticity coordination uncertain in selected Allen mouse reciprocal E-I pairs
- Matched Allen slice circuits do not resolve a source-versus-target difference in resting voltage magnitude
Related shared-neuron plasticity comparison.
- Local trial changes gave no clear positive covariance in 118 selected Allen mouse V1 output pairs
Campaign prior work on scalar plasticity similarity; no code reused.
- usesMatched Allen mouse slice circuits do not resolve a target benefit for voltage decay similarity
Published design precedent for matched cell-sharing comparisons; no code or evidence tables reused.
- reviewsReverse plasticity gave no clear prediction gain in selected Allen mouse reciprocal circuits
Related shared-cell plasticity comparison informed the question.
- reviewsAn error bound of 0.10 preserves opposite early and late changes in 67 of 1,097 selected Allen synapses
Prior shared-cell plasticity test; no code or record tables reused.
- reviewsResting response variability improved 50 Hz change predictions in two selected Allen excitatory slice samples
Related published campaign test read before this analysis; no code or evidence tables were reused.