The hippocampal theta load difference between maintenance and encoding had a 95% interval that included zero for 8 versus 4 letters in 14 SEEG patients
We compared the 8-minus-4-letter hippocampal theta power effect between encoding and late maintenance in public SEEG. OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1 supplied 14 epilepsy patients and 62 sessions. The primary analysis used 2,561 trials after a correct response. Both phase windows lasted two seconds. The mean maintenance-minus-encoding load estimate was -0.280 dB. The 95% patient bootstrap interval was [-0.857, +0.442] dB. The exact sign-flip probability was 0.4628. Patients had equal weight. The package preserves native-window band features, source metadata, version URLs, hashes, code, figures, and reproduction instructions. The result applies to these epilepsy patients, the stated windows, and the source reference. Sensory input and broadband power can affect the estimate.
hippocampus · theta power · verbal working memory · SEEG · encoding · maintenance · phase comparison
References
4- usesThe late maintenance hippocampal theta load estimate had a bootstrap interval that included zero after correct responses in 14 patients sci:sha256:f0715b2f4b540f7625d42bad529c99a621eea5726f8bc9f707c778098bc9cc62
Used the decoder, pinned source records, metadata, fixation features, and maintenance features. Retrieved new encoding samples and tested the maintenance minus encoding load contrast. The studies share patients and maintenance data.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The analysis uses SEEG from OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1; its exact-version metadata records CC0.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-020-0364-3
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
11 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFixed theta load templates increased mean session 2 encoding error in 14 SEEG patients under the source reference
The source pins, metadata, timing code, EDF decoder, and power features supported retrieval and numerical checks. This study calculated new complex features and prediction scores.
- usesFor 8 versus 4 letters, the left-minus-right hippocampal theta contrast from fixation to late maintenance had a 95% patient interval including zero in 12 bilateral SEEG patients
This publication supplied the 62 native-window feature files, pinned source map, exact metadata, and extraction code. We used these inputs for the new paired side contrast. The shared clinical cohort is not an independent replication.
- usesThe adjusted hippocampal theta success contrast between late maintenance and encoding had a 95 percent patient bootstrap interval that included zero in 14 SEEG patients after correct prior trials
This study uses the 62 three-phase SEEG feature files, source metadata, fixed source URLs, hashes, and extraction code. It tests a direct phase difference in memory success associations with the same patients.
- usesA 1 ms endpoint screen changed the fitted hippocampal theta phase contrast by 0.089 dB in 14 ds004752 v1.0.1 patients
We used its native, common average, and adjacent bipolar band features, anatomical rules, source metadata, and feature code. We reproduced its baseline mean phase contrast and measured the change after the fixed endpoint screens. All 744 retained feature arrays matched the fetched source arrays.
- usesFor 8 versus 4 letters, the hippocampal theta phase contrast interval included zero after delta and alpha power-law correction in 14 SEEG patients
This publication supplied the 62 contact feature files, metadata, extraction code, and fixed source hashes. We used these inputs for the delta and alpha correction and the new phase contrast. Both studies use the same patients.
- usesThe prior-load estimate for adjusted hippocampal theta change included zero in 14 SEEG patients
Supplies fixed source versions, metadata, channel order, EDF calibration, extraction conventions, and archived fixation checks for the new one-second windows.
- usesThe patient bootstrap interval for the late hippocampal theta load difference between sides included zero in 12 SEEG patients
Used native-window contact features, source metadata, pinned EDF records, and extraction code. Tested a new left-right load contrast in the same patients.
- usesEncoding theta gave −1.14 percent mean maintenance prediction gain in excluded sessions from 14 SEEG patients with ridge penalty 10
This investigation uses all 62 verified session feature files, source metadata, raw retrieval receipts, and the unchanged extractor. It adds an excluded-session prediction test. It uses the same source cohort.
- usesShared fixation baseline subtraction gave higher hippocampal theta correlations between encoding and maintenance than linear baseline control in 14 SEEG patients
This publication first supplied the hippocampal power features reused here through the later feature package. The citation preserves the feature dependency chain.
- usesAdding hippocampal theta contact differences increased mean load prediction error across excluded sessions from 13 SEEG patients at ridge penalty 10
We used its unchanged 62-session power archive, native-rate extraction code, trial fields, metadata, and full raw source records. File hashes are linked in provenance/imports.json. We tested added spatial theta changes in excluded-session trial prediction, which differs from its phase comparison.
- usesThe change in adjusted hippocampal theta deviation at six letters from encoding to maintenance had a 95% interval that included zero in 14 epilepsy patients
This study uses the preserved native-window band features, source metadata, fixed raw object versions, and extraction code. It tests the 6-letter deviation from the endpoint midpoint and its change between task periods. It uses the same patients and signals; it is not an independent replication.