Five-pulse noise scaling reduced later single-pulse error for 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG in eight patient sessions

1. supersedesFive-pulse noise scaling reduced later single-pulse error for 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:21dab4d38cd5c20d6077ddeee2cf0971c912069b7c5920471f4ef26f6cc2a568

   This version corrects one report sentence about site inclusion. All 86 retained sites had at least one eligible readout. Analysis, results, and figures are unchanged.

2. usesA five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions sci:sha256:b5b7963746f5c6d2a2a8f7844ec590732a4eb152bc7a70979b3bc95c3e27820f

   This study used the eligible pairs, ordered pulse products, source metadata, and extraction code from this publication. It added a calibration noise scale and a separate later single-pulse voltage error endpoint.

3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

   The analyzed SEEG source dataset is OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1; its recorded snapshot URL and file hashes are preserved in the archive.

4. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
5. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

• usesA site blend fitted with five pulses did not establish lower 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error in eight sessions

  We used the exact eight-session voltage Gram matrices, event maps, source quality rules, and separate pair scale. They supplied the early calibration and later pulse inputs for this site blend test.

• usesSelection of time bins from five pulses reduced storage and increased mean later SEEG error at 86 sites in eight reused sessions

  We used its five-pulse clipped cross-pulse noise scale as the full-resolution reference. We applied the same scale formula after each time projection and in each omitted-pulse fitting fold.

• usesFive later pulses did not establish higher SEEG size correlation for shared contacts than for nearby separate contacts at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions

  Uses the preserved ten-pulse Gram matrices, corrected pulse order, and source metadata as fixed inputs. Tests a new within-shaft contact-overlap size correlation question.

• usesFive early response pulses gave lower mean error for later 20–500 ms sample variance in SEEG from eight people

  This earlier study supplies the pulse products through the immediate data parent. It tests a mean voltage forecast that uses early pulse variance. The new result measures variance forecast error directly.

• usesIdeal signed scale changes left 84.5 percent of 20–500 ms SEEG error for a fixed five-pulse waveform in eight patient sessions

  Uses the five-pulse early noise scale inherited through the direct parent and preserves attribution for that forecast rule.

• usesPre-pulse scaling gave no clear gain over half-size one-pulse forecasts of centered SEEG at 20–500 ms in eight sessions

  We used the exact trial products for all eight sessions, the spatial inclusion rules, and the unmodified source extractor. The five-pulse repeat rule supplied the descriptive benchmark. We tested a new one-pulse rule with a fixed half-size control and first-pulse error weights.

• usesSeven calibration pulses gave a 3.33% mean person error reduction over five for centered 20 to 500 ms SEEG at 86 selected readouts in eight sessions

  We use its shared energy scale for a centered calibration mean. We fit this scale separately at five, six, and seven pulses and compare the same later targets.

• usesA correction from one SEEG pair increased mean 20–500 ms error over scaled templates at other shafts in eight sessions

  This work supplies the scaled template baseline, source metadata, retrieval code, and within-pair audit data.

• usesLater pulse variation accounted for 72.1 percent of normalized 20–500 ms SEEG error for a scaled five-pulse forecast in eight patient sessions

  We reused its five-pulse scaled forecast, selected pairs, and exact pulse products. We reproduced 288 patient forecast-loss comparisons. The new result splits its remaining single-pulse error into test-pulse variation and distance to the test mean.

• usesFour frequency scales did not show lower mean 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG forecast error than one scale at 86 selected sites in eight sessions with five calibration pulses

  Supplied the five-pulse one-scale noise rule. It is the primary baseline for the four-frequency-scale test.

• usesNoise scaling removed the observed mean pooling gain for centered SEEG forecasts at 20–500 ms after contact order reversal in two recordings

  Adapts the mathematical calibration noise scale to a three-pulse new mean and an eight-pulse pooled mean. The pooled noise estimate uses variance within each contact order. The implementation is new. No data or Python code from this source study are used. Preserved description and protocol retain attribution and CC BY 4.0.

• usesSharing early variance estimates reduced later 20 to 500 ms SEEG log size interval score at 53 sites in eight patient sessions

  This work supplied the exact eight-session pulse products, source metadata, corrected time-to-row mapping, and public source extractor. We used all compact inputs and rebuilt two complete author derivatives.

• Four donor components increased mean squared voltage error 6.58% versus noise scaling after five calibration pulses in eight SEEG sessions

  [Legacy relation: reproduces] The patient scores reproduce its noise-scaling comparison to numerical precision.

• usesNoise correction increased readout agreement for 20–500 ms SEEG from five pulses with 3-bit dither encoding and lossless overflow in eight patients

  Used its candidate map, early/later pulse split, retrieval code, exact source products, and five-pulse forecast method. New source downloads reproduce its products and supply all candidate voltages.

• usesOne shared site scale gave a mean patient error increase of 0.93% for 20–500 ms SEEG forecasts after five calibration pulses in eight sessions

  This publication supplied the exact 24 trial-product input files, source versions and hashes, chronological pulse selection, and separate readout scale rule. The new comparison fits one shared scale at each stimulation site and tests its later waveform error.

• usesA fixed 1.5 factor reduced relative error estimate differences for five-pulse remote SEEG means at 20–500 ms in eight patients

  This publication supplied the exact centered bipolar pulse products, source event indices, extraction code, and source provenance. The new study tests error estimates for the arithmetic mean. It does not use the parent noise-scaled forecast.

• usesA fixed one-pair model raised mean relative error by 12.4% for later five-pulse SEEG forecasts in seven people

  This study uses the archived first-five and final-five mean SEEG traces, edge tables, and site tables. It checks all parent file hashes. It tests spatial transfer across later stimulation sites at the archived 256 Hz rate.

• usesTwenty cosine coefficients increased mean 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error versus full scaled templates in eight patient sessions with five calibration pulses

  This work supplied the fixed sample identities and the calibration noise scale rule. The new test compared a compact cosine template with that full waveform rule.

• usesPast pulse updates reduced normalized 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error versus fixed five-pulse templates at 86 selected sites in eight epilepsy sessions

  Uses the earlier shared-energy scale for mean waveform forecasts. The new code applies that scale to every available past history length.

First page of citations