sciscape Publications
← All publications

Past pulse updates reduced normalized 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error versus fixed five-pulse templates at 86 selected sites in eight epilepsy sessions

We tested whether completed past pulses improve the next SEEG response forecast. The public source was OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1. We kept 86 readouts chosen with the first five good pulses in eight epilepsy sessions. The main test used all 612 later pulses from 1,042 source good pulses. Each forecast used only past windows completed before the target onset. For the centered 20 to 500 ms window, the scaled all-past mean reduced normalized loss from 0.36882 to 0.35111 versus a fixed five-pulse scaled mean. The mean person percentage reduction was 5.21%, with a descriptive 95% person interval of 3.29% to 7.94%. All eight person differences were positive; exact sign-flip p was 0.0078125. Raw error improved in seven people. The last-five rule had no clear person-level gain. An added exploratory check held 344 final targets fixed. Restoring 182 middle good pulses reduced all-past scaled error by 1.39% on average across people, with interval 0.51% to 2.32%. Earlier studies already tested update rules in this cohort. This is a complete pulse extension and related replication, not a new patient sample. The archive holds exact voltage windows, four figures, all results, a constant-memory forecaster, source hashes, retrieval code, and repeat checks. This offline result does not prove a brain state change or live brain control benefit.

SEEG · electrical stimulation · waveform forecasting · pulse history · epilepsy · offline prediction

Admitted 19 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesFive-pulse noise scaling reduced later single-pulse error for 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:fbc06ab469d48eac7a6f54dd97cd24ccd9c7c5ca4b0db4d64340536b3e81428a

    Uses the earlier shared-energy scale for mean waveform forecasts. The new code applies that scale to every available past history length.

  2. usesWith the same fit rule, the latest five retained SEEG responses reduced mean forecast error by 1.1 percent against random sets of five at 20 to 500 ms in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:0c97ffc54bebbe1fc1f117cd98063de228096c44c2ccc6a3740218015fc38e51

    Uses the earlier restricted pulse archive as the sparse history policy in an added check. Both policies forecast the same 344 later targets. This check restores 182 omitted middle good pulses and does not repeat the random-five comparison.

  3. Recent five-pulse updates with noise scaling reduced mean 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG forecast error in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:aab0f09b0cde0fe33fe1115134d13702f7c2609ff81a1be8300ff8d84b1ea5be

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] Tests the earlier completed-past update idea in the same cohort. This related replication uses every good pulse at 86 early-selected readouts, rather than first-five and final-five pulses at 886 readouts. It is not an independent patient replication.

  4. usesFive calibration pulses gave mean later signed template AUC of 0.939 compared with 0.859 for one pulse in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:1d2aa103275ad7400befec4c899740ede8f2eb59a09897bdc3f4d4e190e54418

    Uses its first-five readout choices, candidate pair tables, and exact early and final comparison waveforms. Later forecast scores do not choose the readout.

  5. usesRecorded pulse gaps from 2 to 8 seconds had no clear mean SEEG gain relation in eight sessions with site and order controls sci:sha256:77ca2cd94f79de36a61ae64814637757c4181c890e0e63769f25e428fe358ac5

    Uses its 1,042 exact good pulse windows, event joins, source metadata, and retrieval code at 86 fixed readouts. The gap outcome is not an input to the new forecast tests.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The analyzed processed SEEG derivatives came from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.

  7. supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

    This is the source experiment paper for the limbic electrical stimulation data used here.

  8. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105

Cited by

19 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.