11,505 Publications · 65,152 Citations

We tested whether known chemical filters ensure reliable prediction after electrical connections are removed. We derived a bound for a stable linear model with reciprocal gaps and filtered chemical currents. Cell parameters and the first-order observation filter were known. The bound covers every current history with a fixed amplitude limit. A four-cell example used 1 ms chemical and 0.5 s observation times. A response error of 0.01 permitted either intact circuit. Their steady gap-removal responses differed by exactly 10/21 in normalized voltage units. Any rule can therefore have error of at least 5/21 in one compatible circuit under the stated bounded-error model. The same change on the full 302-cell Cook neural support gave a sufficient shared-data error radius of 0.01720. Its gap-removal difference was 0.47448. Contact counts define support only. All functional weights are synthetic. The result extends prior fast-filter examples to complete continuous responses with fixed, known chemical times. It gives no trial-count limit for independent random noise and does not predict worm drug effects. The package contains the proof, a certificate tool, source facts, model matrices, figures, checks, and offline repeat instructions.

We asked whether known electrical contacts can separate readout delay from neural delay. We used the corrected July 2020 Cook C. elegans map and proved an inverse response rule. An electrical direction with no parallel chemical current identifies a normalized readout transfer value from DC and a response at another rate. The rule requires a complete square response matrix, a linear model, static input gains, and correct contact support. It cancels unknown real input and output gains. For a readout with one decay time, one complex sine matrix is enough. The map had 1,428 eligible directions that covered 283 of 302 cell slots; 254 cells had more than one anchor. A stable chosen model recovered the one-time parameters with relative error below 6.3e-15. In 30 error draws at each of four frequencies, a 0.1% response-matrix norm error left a median 67.5% of cells within 10% time error at the best tested frequency. A passive three-cell example gave 47.6% error after one cell was hidden. A common actuator delay could move into the readout filters without changing the complete observed response. The result is a conditional calibration method and a set of failure tests. It does not estimate conductances or indicator times in living worms. The package preserves proofs, code, contact tables, source checks, model parameters, cell estimates and figures.

We tested whether one source gain can preserve a measured output map across two pulses at 30 Hz. We used 76 inhibitory connections from 30 PV neurons in 21 mice. Exact presynaptic waveform matches identified shared exposures in 44 of 67 edge pairs. A tool averages fourth-order voltage products over distinct exposures. It estimates squared pulse-vector determinants without bias under independent stationary exposures and fixed sampling and peak rules. It allows correlated outputs within an exposure. Trial adjustment reduced a pooled map score from 1.53% to 0.83%. The central 95% whole-mouse resample range was 0.29% to 1.18%. Matched blocks of five exposures gave 0.68%, with range -0.47% to 1.26%. Bounded output contrasts also gave no clear repeatable difference across separate trial halves. Serial noise in a synthetic common-gain model could create a positive adjusted score. These results did not give a clear rejection of a common gain when trial dependence was allowed. Full-record selection and peak annotations also limit the unbiased interpretation. The contribution is a small method, its proof, and a checked benchmark with 129 selected records and 2,519 trial identities across output and input panels. This is a reanalysis of slice voltage data, not an EM connectome or a conductance measurement. We preserve source versions and hashes, code, compact data, all results, figures, and repeat instructions.

Question: In mouse visual cortex, do axons select excitatory (E) targets by orientation preference beyond axon–dendrite overlap and soma distance (Peters' rule), and do excitatory and inhibitory axons differ? Approach: We used the public MICrONS minnie65 v1507 data from one mouse: 2,141 proofread axons, all 337,312,429 synapses, and digital-twin orientation tuning for 21,381 co-registered E neurons. Overlap was the number of shared 5 µm cubes between the output synapses of an axon and the input synapses of a neuron. For each real partner, we drew surrogates from unconnected candidates in the same overlap bin and 10 µm soma-distance bin. Results: Connected E→E pairs of tuned neurons had a mean cos 2Δθ 0.050 higher than matched unconnected pairs (95% CI 0.041 to 0.059; 41,058 connections). The excess was 0.044, 0.111 and 0.148 for 1, 2 and 3 or more synapses. The summed input vector of a neuron predicted its own orientation better than surrogate inputs (margin 0.041, CI 0.030 to 0.053; 18,956 neurons). The excess pointed to the neuron's own orientation, not to that of its neighbours. It was clear for L4 and L5 targets but not for L2/3 targets. Surrogate inputs gave 80% of the prediction score at 20 inputs, because orientation preference is spatially clustered. At 50 targets per axon, the targets of E axons had higher pair similarity than surrogates (ΔS 0.020, CI 0.016 to 0.024; 1,198 axons). Basket cell axons did not (ΔS −0.000, CI −0.009 to 0.008; 200 axons). The E minus basket difference was 0.020 (CI 0.010 to 0.030) and stayed positive (0.012 to 0.020) with manual co-registration, a stricter model fit, and 10 µm cubes. Martinotti, bipolar and neurogliaform results were not clear. The targets of 284 inhibitory neurons did not align with the orientation of their own excitatory inputs. Pitfall: basket and Martinotti axons contact more than 80% of high-overlap candidates. Surrogates drawn without replacement then lost the distance match for 42% of basket targets. With 25–50 µm bins, this gave a false basket effect equal to the E effect. Limitations: one mouse; model-derived tuning of E neurons only; proofread axons are not a random sample; synapse positions approximate axon and dendrite paths; absolute effects are small. Code, result tables, derived tables, figures and instructions are included.

We tested whether remaining first-response voltage explains a smaller second response product in reciprocal PV and pyramidal cell connections. We used public 30 Hz slice recordings from mouse V1. An additive model subtracted a fitted exponential first-response tail at each source second peak. The primary sample had 56 pairs from 25 mice. The equal-mouse mean bounded product change was -0.300, with a 95% mouse resample range of -0.361 to -0.241. The same pairs gave -0.321 with local baselines and -0.037 with the original baseline. The paired model-minus-local shift was uncertain. All specified checks retained a decrease, but a linear continuation stress test gave a smaller estimate of -0.092. A withheld six-ms segment showed positive inhibitory forecast bias of 0.054 first-amplitude units. The model therefore did not fully capture the observed first decay. Odd and even trial scores had modest pair agreement. Independent solvers and exact-model synthetic checks passed. These results describe the tested tail assumptions. They do not identify an isolated second response, conductance change or feedback gain. The package preserves code, full and split waveforms, source hashes, all fits, scores, resample draws, figures and repeat instructions.

We tested whether repeated spikes preserve the response strength order of two outputs from one neuron. In Allen mouse V1 slice data, 30 of 175 output pairs reversed measured order between the first response and pulses 6–8 at 50 Hz. Each connection had at least ten accepted first and late observations. Six reversals remain when each amplitude error is bounded by 10% of its measured magnitude plus 20 microvolts. This bound is an assumption, not a confidence limit. We give an exact uncertainty rule and all pair scores. In separate 30 Hz mouse V1 data, ten of 100 output pairs reversed their first-to-second local voltage order. Three kept the same opposite orders in both alternating trial halves. Measuring the second peak from the original baseline gave ten reversals in the same 100-pair panel, but only four overlapped with the local-baseline reversals. In 144 annotated connections from 24 mouse labels, separate connection means gave no clear repeat prediction gain over a rank-one output model. The gain was −2.90%, with a conditional 95% mouse range of −14.19% to +5.38%. These selected physiological graphs are not complete anatomical connectomes. The 50 Hz source lacks raw events, and the two datasets use different response measures. The results show observed changes in output order and the limits of treating small changes as reliable routing effects. The package preserves code, repeated-trial values, selection IDs, figures, provenance and repeat steps.

We tested how a second spike changes a response score for two neurons connected in both directions. We used released 30-Hz slice recordings from mouse primary visual cortex. The sample had 60 pairs from 25 mice. Each pair had one pyramidal neuron and one parvalbumin-positive inhibitory neuron. We multiplied the excitatory voltage response by the negative inhibitory voltage response. With a local baseline for each response, the median second-to-first product ratio was 0.487. The equal-mouse mean bounded change was -0.331, with a 95% mouse resampling interval of -0.397 to -0.268. All 25 mouse means were negative. The inhibitory return response accounted for most of the decrease. An added check measured the second peak from the original baseline. That product had no clear decrease: mean bounded change -0.033, with interval -0.110 to +0.041. The paired shift between baseline measures was +0.299, with interval +0.239 to +0.352. Much of the first inhibitory response was still present. Thus, a smaller added response does not establish a smaller total voltage excursion or feedback gain. Odd and even trial scores had modest pair-level agreement, with Spearman correlation 0.315. We reproduced all 628 embedded source waveforms from their first ten accepted trials. The package preserves new code, derived trial and pair data, source hashes, figures, uncertainty draws, and repeat steps. The data describe selected slice connections, not a complete connectome or an active closed loop.

We tested whether a known reverse connection size helps predict mean synaptic cleft size in mouse cortex. We read all 303,164,967 connection records in MICrONS v1507 and retained the complete selected graph of 3,876,197 edges among 63,594 putative excitatory soma neurons. A five-fold test excluded both directions of each test pair from fitting. The reverse size was given for each separate completion query. In 38,397 reciprocal pairs with soma distance at most 200 micrometres, reverse size reduced squared log size error by 1.322% after cell, class, count and soma geometry controls. The conditional neuron-weight range was 0.934–1.715%. However, 2,114 pairs with opposite-direction sites within 1 micrometre supplied 100.52% of the net error reduction. The original rule gave -0.008% gain on the other pairs. A follow-up model with site distance calibration left a gain of 0.062%, with a neuron-weight range of -0.003–0.125%. Refitting after removal of nearby pairs retained a smaller 0.238% gain, so separated sizes are not shown to be independent. A secondary test of 274 orientation-selective pairs gave no clear relation between preferred orientation similarity and size mismatch. Raw CSV and cached Parquet site scans agreed exactly on all 113,174 reciprocal sites. The result shows that site geometry can dominate a size completion score. It does not establish matched physiological strength or identify false synapses. One mouse, incomplete axons, predicted classes, selected functional matches and post-plan follow-ups limit interpretation. The package preserves the full selected graph, site records, pair errors and predictions, code, provenance, figures and repeat instructions.

We tested whether close synapses from different source neurons have similar visual orientation estimates. We scanned all 337,312,429 records in the MICrONS v1507 filtered synapse table. We kept 328,340 contacts from 3,437 selected sources. The planned test used 354 targets with cleaned dendrite labels and both close and reference source pairs. Close meant at most 5 micrometres. Reference meant greater than 20 and at most 50 micrometres. Each distinct source pair entered once per target, using its minimum contact distance. The mean orientation similarity contrast was -0.06932. The exact mean under source record shuffles within area, cell type and 100 micrometre soma cubes was +0.00801. The upper-tail probability was 0.972 from 999 draws. A planned broader target check and a readout-center test also gave no clear excess similarity. An added description used individual contact pairs on the same 354 targets. Including pairs from one source changed the orientation contrast from -0.07080 to +0.12872. With equal target weights, one-source pairs formed 22.30% of close pairs and 1.89% of reference pairs. Their similarity was 1 by definition under a source tuning assignment. This positive contact score alone cannot establish grouping of distinct inputs. The results use model estimates and straight-line distances in one mouse. They do not establish a lack of functional grouping on dendritic branches. The package preserves the compact location data, code, source hashes, all draws, figures and repeat steps. A full raw-data scan matched every selected contact field. A replay reproduced 29 numerical result files exactly.

We tested recorded inhibitory inputs against model motion direction selectivity in one MICrONS v1507 mouse volume. A full scan of 303,164,967 connection records gave 27,308,102 incoming synapses for 8,061 selected targets. Consistently typed sources covered 8.66% of these synapses. Their inhibitory fraction and type shares reduced prediction error by 0.105%, with a conditional 95% block range of -0.177% to +0.400%. This gave no clear added gain. We then kept all broad source signs fixed and gave each unknown source segment one binary sign for all its targets. Broad signs covered 8.84% of inputs. Under this model, exact bounds on covariance of total recorded inhibitory synapse fraction with the baseline residual of model selectivity were -0.014701 to +0.014730. Complete source sign assignments reached both endpoints. Both signs remained possible when all unknown segments that reached only one selected target had to share one sign. Median per-target inhibitory fraction bounds were 6.27% and 97.36%. A secondary spatial score gave small gains that varied across splits. The bounds identify missing information, not real transmitter labels. Source fragments, count-based strength, model labels and one mouse limit biological claims. The package preserves code, source hashes, selected summaries, predictions, exact bound witnesses, figures and repeat steps.

We tested how sharing chemical time constants affects recovery of electrical and chemical weights. The model used the corrected Cook C. elegans graph, calibrated currents and voltages, reciprocal gaps and one-pole chemical filters. When all outputs from a source shared one unknown time, one exact complex sine response matrix identified all weights, source times, leaks and capacitances. All 295 chemical source cells had an edge without a gap that fixed the source time from phase. Synthetic recovery errors were below 2.7e-15. Of these sources, 276 had several anchors. Their phase ratios rejected sharing in a separate edge-specific synthetic model. No biological response data were fitted. As a comparison, independent edge times left 178 changes after two real Laplace matrices at rates 0 and 1 with free leaks, or 26 with known leaks. A third real matrix gave unique recovery under the one-pole rule. Fast filters made this third contrast weak: two stable full models differed by only 1.50e-8 in its relative norm, but by 2.77% in the steady response after gap removal. This extends prior DC-plus-sine recovery work with an explicit sharing rule, source anchors and a known-leak real-rate analysis. Source sharing is a strong model assumption. Hidden cells, unknown gains, extra poles and nonlinear currents can change the result. The package preserves proofs, source facts and hashes, exact certificates, model arrays, code, figures and repeat instructions.

We tested whether path source maps add information about neural response detection. We used four anatomy exports and a pinned WT signal atlas. The graph retained 298 neurons. The main sample had 21,074 measured ordered pairs without recorded direct edges. Of 1,378 pairs with two-edge paths formed only by pooling, 42 had q < 0.05 (3.05 percent). The rate was 3.12 percent without a two-edge path and 5.28 percent with a path in one source map. Fixed logistic models controlled for neuron identity, trial count, soma distance, reverse chemical count, and degree. Ten folds kept opposite directions and bilateral copies together. Adding the number of relays supported by one map reduced Brier error from 0.03512860 to 0.03511418. The gain was 0.00001442, or 0.041 percent. A central 95 percent node weight range was -0.00004351 to 0.00007799. It includes zero and keeps fitted predictions fixed. The added count gave small losses with chemical edges only, two modern adult maps only, and an edge cutoff of two. Forty-seven relays with no response record supplied possible paths for 1,591 main pairs. The package preserves code, factual input extracts, source hashes, all results, figures, and repeat instructions. Independent route and arithmetic checks passed. A fresh source rebuild matched all 42 compared numerical files. This test withholds atlas entries. It does not establish signal routes or accuracy in new animals.

We tested if a measured partial loss of electrical coupling fixes the response after complete loss. In a linear circuit, exact maps fix this forecast under three conditions. The removed conductance fraction is known and uniform. Cell and recording properties stay fixed. All changed endpoints have input and output access. Other cells can stay hidden. We give a proof, a prediction tool and a deterministic error certificate. We used the corrected July 2020 Cook C. elegans neural contact support. It has 302 cells, 3,671 chemical directions and 1,091 electrical pairs. We chose stable models with varied capacitances, gains and chemical filters. The solver did not receive these parameters. Across 96 exact settings, the largest relative forecast error was 2.13e-12. Global removal had 298 changed endpoints. Removal of 32 internal pharyngeal gaps needed only 20 ports under the sufficient rule. Hiding a changed endpoint gave an exact 14.3% error in a passive two-cell example. In the chosen full model, 0.5% spectral-norm response errors gave median DC half-block forecast error of 20.58% for global removal. The pharyngeal error was 1.42%. Dose and gain changes also caused bias. Agreement of inverse slopes at two doses did not prove selectivity. The package keeps code, proofs, input tables, source hashes, model parameters, panels, error seeds, results, figures and repeat steps. Source checks and a clean numerical repeat passed. These are mathematical and synthetic method results. They are not measured conductances or animal intervention effects.

We tested whether wiring from the previous light target helps predict the calcium response after the next pulse in C. elegans. We added exact pulse history to a signed matched-window dataset and checked the original processed files in a fixed DANDI release. The selected panel had 124 source switches in 36 worms and 2,786 downstream measurements. A fixed ridge test kept each test worm out of fitting and tuning. The model supplied cell labels, cell state, source activity, position and current-source wiring. Adding 18 terms for previous-source wiring raised mean test error by 0.40%. A central 95% range from 300 animal refits allowed a 2.13% error increase to a 0.77% decrease. The before-period test and five planned checks also gave no clear added gain. Most pulse gaps were near 30 seconds. Label and trace rules retained only 36 of 90 parent worms. The result limits this static prediction rule; it does not show that previous pulses have no biological effect. The package preserves the new event-linked table, code, provenance, model states, predictions, figures and repeat instructions.

We tested how a red reference changes a calcium response measure used in connectome studies. We compared green-only and framewise green/red response rules on the same 48,300 selected event-target measurements from 103 C. elegans recordings. The rules gave opposite observed signs in 8,801 measurements (18.22%). When both changes were at least 5% in magnitude, 585 of 17,976 measurements had opposite signs (3.25%). We then used products from different animals for 5,320 directed pairs with at least three animals each. Under independent animals and stable selected-pair means, these products estimate squared response-mean components without same-animal products. After neuron and cubic soma-distance controls, the estimated overlap with 11 unsigned wiring features was 0.002406 for green only and 0.002212 for green/red. The paired change was -0.000194, with a normal animal-jackknife range from -0.000905 to 0.000517. This range does not establish equivalence. An added audit on the same valid frames retained 8,800 sign disagreements. The study shows sensitivity of observed window signs to the response rule. It does not identify which rule better measures neural activity. The package preserves channel summaries, code, exact source records, all specified checks, figures and repeat instructions.

We tested a possible chemical relay after targeted neural activation in immobilized transgenic C. elegans. Cells near the light spot could send signals to distant response cells. We used measured image distances and two adult C. elegans maps to score these routes. The main panel had 19,853 observations from 1,585 stimulations, 2,417 ordered neuron pairs and 101 recordings. Pair separation was at least 20 micrometres in the image plane. The model held each neuron pair and each stimulation event fixed. It controlled direct image distances, fluorescence noise and cell-label coverage. Under an assumed Gaussian footprint with planar and axial SDs of 3 and 6 micrometres, the positive-response term was +0.117 percentage points per score SD. Its pointwise 95% interval was -0.176 to +0.410. All five probability intervals included zero. Continuous-response slopes were small and positive. Two width checks had unadjusted p values below 0.05, but no width passed five-test Holm correction. Separate anatomical maps, a stricter light-spot distance rule and an alternate count export gave similar probability results. The test found no clear support for this fixed chemical relay score. It does not exclude unintended activation, small effects, or other signal routes. The package preserves source tables, code, figures, complete results, source hashes and repeat instructions.

We tested how a known readout filter changes the input frequency needed to separate electrical and chemical coupling. We used the 302-cell Cook C. elegans contact map. We kept the complete steady response fixed and tested 26 joint gap and chemical changes. The linear model had known unit leak and capacitance, a known chemical decay time of one, and complete calibrated input and output matrices. We computed joint local information with independent additive response error of fixed variance. In the main chosen model, a readout decay time of five leak times shifted the best tested angular frequency from 0.792 to 0.343 per leak time. At that readout speed, this frequency gave 2.04 times the smallest information eigenvalue obtained at the voltage optimum. All 13 chosen weight settings showed a downward shift. A known filter could be inverted, but the increased error left information unchanged. A declared secondary test of the complete response after gap removal gave an optimum of 0.331; the earlier weight optimum raised its variance bound by 0.10%. We provide a compact information method, proofs, a finite model pair, source checks, code and three figures. These are conditional model results. We did not fit animal recordings, estimate physiological weights or select a laboratory protocol.

We tested whether the sign of a calcium fluorescence change transfers between separate C. elegans animals. We used three matched 8 s windows from DANDI 001075, release 0.240930.1859. Anatomical counts came from the corrected Cook map. In a fixed split of 96 worms, 135 neuron pairs had negative discovery means. Thirty-six other worms supplied test values. Their mean after-light log change was +0.0194. Their mean change relative to the earlier trend was +0.0261. The 97.5% conditional jackknife range was +0.0039 to +0.0483. All ten specified alternative splits also gave positive group means. Seven of eleven trend ranges included zero. These splits reuse animals. For the 314-pair main panel, sign agreement was 54.8%, versus 57.8% for an always-positive rule. Adding wiring to source and target identity reduced Brier error for trend sign by 0.00119. The 97.5% range was -0.00036 to +0.00274. A higher-confidence subset gave a small gain. Only 16 main pairs had direct chemical support. The result limits sign assignment from unthresholded short-window means. It does not test the curated atlas inhibitory fraction or prove synaptic polarity. The package preserves code, data sources, raw windows, animal-level responses, splits, predictions, model states and figures.

We tested which selective chemical release blocks can separate chemical and electrical coupling in a defined worm model. The 302-cell model used the Cook graph corrected in July 2020. Gaps were reciprocal, chemical currents had no time filter, and all inputs and voltages were calibrated. A block reduced outgoing chemical coefficients by a known fraction. We derived the exact remaining ambiguity from an incidence submatrix. With known baseline leaks, eight selected cells were necessary and sufficient to remove 26 unresolved coupling directions. With unknown leaks, the minimum was 80 cells. One joint block can use one extra complete response condition. Independent integer searches rejected all seven-cell and 79-cell designs in the respective cases. A fixed list of 132 known leak values also made the displayed eight-cell set sufficient. The known-leak minimum fell to one, one, and zero cells at contact cutoffs of three, five, and ten serial sections. Two positive synthetic circuits had identical intact responses and identical responses after seven selected blocks. Adding the eighth cell separated their responses. Nine complete-response recovery tests had maximum parameter error below 3.34e-15. Calibrated partial blocks retained exact identification but weak blocks increased error in an explicit inverse-response noise test. Unknown diagonal load changes during the block did not add coupling ambiguity. The package gives code, pinned graph facts, source checks, exact search records, numerical results, figures, and repeat instructions. These are conditional model results. We did not estimate actual worm conductances or establish experimental access to the full response matrices.